On Mon, June 20, 2005 1:18 pm, Johnny Hughes said: >> Quoting alex@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx: >>> What might be checked first is if FC3 NPTL fix for i386 glibc is >>> reallity? Is >>> it included with RHEL4 glibc? >> >> I just took a quick look at the RHEL4 glibc spec file. It contains >> lines: >> >> %define nptlarches i386 i686 athlon x86_64 ia64 s390 s390x sparcv9 ppc >> ppc64 >> >> and then: >> >> %ifarch %{nptlarches} >> %define enablekernelnptl 2.4.20 >> %ifarch i386 >> %define nptl_target_cpu i486 >> %define tls_subdir tls/i486 >> %else >> %define nptl_target_cpu %{_target_cpu} >> %define tls_subdir tls >> %endif >> %endif >> >> So, I'd say just compile it for i386, and it should work correctly. >> It'll >> use >> i486 instructions for NPTL support. Some testing to see if NPTL is >> really >> working might be needed. That's apperently the way Red Hat is doing it, >> so >> CentOS should follow. >> > > RedHat doesn't support i586 support at all with CentOS-4 ... not via the > kernel or glibc. CentOS (starting with version 3.3) built an i586 kernel. > I meant with RHEL-4 :)