3.x ->3.5 update?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On Sun, 2005-06-19 at 22:56 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Fri, 2005-06-17 at 23:11, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> > > On my Centos 3.4 boxes that were up to date a day or two ago, yum wants
> > > to update just about everything today.  Is that normal?
> > > 
> > 
> > Yes ... we shifted to 3.5 from 3.4 yesterday.
> > 
> > All the security updates of update 5 were done when released.
> 
> Thanks, but I thought that 3.5 was just the cumulative updates
> to 3.x rolled into a new iso.   If that's the case, why would
> an up to date 3.4 download everything again? 
> 

It should not download everything again ... it should replace everything
here

( https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/rhel3as-errata.html ) 

that was released between 2005-05-16 and 2005-05-19 and is a RHEA or a
RHBA.  

That is a significant number of packages.

RedHat released these as update 5, we incorporated them into CentOS 3.5.
Any that were RHSA's were integrated ASAP on the day of release, as they
are security fixes ... the RHEA and RHBA come as a group afterwards
since they are enhancements and bugfixes.

Those should be the packages you see trying to be upgraded.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20050620/5f27c057/attachment.bin

[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux