On Thu, 2005-06-09 at 14:50 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-06-09 at 14:47 -0500, Mark A. Lewis wrote:
> > Since we recently got a site agreement for RHEL at work, I have been
> > using it more. It seems that CentOS 4 and RHEL 4 are very different.
> > CentOS seems to come with newer packages and overall be a more
> > polished distro. This afternoon I will compare some packages and
> > versions.
> >
> > Is it just me?
> >
> > --
>
> CentOS has some newer packages in the CentOSPlus repo ... but if you
> have all the updates and on extras / centosplus then they are the same.
>
OK ... my fingers were to fast :)
If you have all the RHEL updates and all the CentOS updates ... and if
you do not install any extras/addons/centosplus from centos then centos
4 and RHEL are the same
> (Except CentOS has yum/up2date for updates ... vice up2date only from
> redhat)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20050609/a6f35c9c/attachment.bin
