As fas as I know WebDAV is preferred as an access mechanism over
FrontPage extensions. However I do not know much about "forms, counters,
etc". I guess they won't be necessary since almost all servers support
Asp.Net or PHP with little effert.
-- sukru
Jacob Leaver wrote:
>FrontPage Extensions are EOL, no replacements planned. I'd speculate that
>Microsoft chose to do this because of the sharepoint direction that they are
>headed in, along with, I am sure, market share concerns.
>
>In our hosting environment, I've EOL'd 'em too. I always enjoyed UNIX FP
>better than Windows, however, we now run a Windows 2003 server specifically
>for those customers who will not, or can not use more secure, less
>proprietary alternatives.
>
>Just my two cents.
>
>Jacob Leaver
>Senior Systems Administrator
>ReachONE Internet
>
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "John Hinton" <webmaster@xxxxxxxx>
>To: "CentOS mailing list" <centos@xxxxxxxxxx>
>Sent: Monday, June 06, 2005 6:26 AM
>Subject: Re: FrontPage Extensions
>
>
>Bob Pierce wrote:
>
>
>
>>Has anyone had success getting FrontPage extensions to work with
>>Centos-4.
>>I've been trying to set up a virtual hosting server with front page
>>support.
>>I found this page to help getting around the selinux problems:
>>_http://www.rtr.com/fp2002disc/_disc2/00000be5.htm_
>>but each problem I overcome I keep hitting another...
>>Just wondering if anyone's had success with this on Centos-4 or if
>>you've found any good tips to share.
>>Thanks for your help,
>>Bob Pierce.
>>
>>!DSPAM:42a449bb61377686111293!
>>
>>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>CentOS mailing list
>>CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
>>http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>>
>>
>>!DSPAM:42a449bb61377686111293!
>>
>>
>>
>>
>I "had" it running on CentOS 3. I plan to never do it again. Server
>updates, not sure which ones, would kill it. I'd have to go through the
>whole convoluted install process again...
>
>FrontPage will switch over to a "good" FTP mode easily, leaving only the
>"extensions" to deal with. The most used would be the form. I simply do
>a default install of a really good form script and provide the alternate
>instructions to our users. I've not had request for any other "extensions".
>
>RTR also has EOLs posted, which were unclear to me, but I didn't see
>replacements listed for those products going into EOL, which was everything.
>
>All things to be considered.
>
>John Hinton
>_______________________________________________
>CentOS mailing list
>CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
>http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>
>_______________________________________________
>CentOS mailing list
>CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
>http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>
>
