On Fri, 3 Jun 2005, Bryan J. Smith <b.j.smith@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Ugo Bellavance wrote:
> > The thing is that sometimes threads start as technical and end up by
> > opninated, endless discussions.
>
> It depends. Sometimes people just differ on what context they are using,
> so they will differ by nature.
>
> I think the comments on Red Hat in general just need to die though. It's
> clear there are some people just don't like Red Hat, and no amount of
> discussion is going to change that.
Bryan, sometimes I think you read too much between the lines than
generally advisable. Before you were on this list we didn't have such
discussions and I don't feel there was an anti-Red Hat theme back then.
To be honest, I think you're creating the anti-Red Hat feeling with some
of the black and white comments and opinions (and maybe by repeating that
you have to fight it). This list used to be about the technical part, not
about politics and flavored opinions. That seemed to have changed when you
started mailing :/
> I am a writer by trade. I can crank out a productive 45 words/minute.
> 5-15 words/minute effective for publication (i.e., including draft,
> review, etc...).
And this obviously does not include the words/minute your mails are
generating in reaction. I think you earn some of the credit for the
reactions too, don't be too humble :p
-- dag wieers, dag@xxxxxxxxxx, http://dag.wieers.com/ --
[all I want is a warm bed and a kind word and unlimited power]
