-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, Jun 03, 2005 at 03:52:14AM -0300, Rodrigo Barbosa wrote: > But, then again, it is completely useless for me to continue arguing > with you until I provide the document I said I would. Just writing > e-mails about it won't make my point any stronger. I just found the document I was refering too. Uppon rereading it, I noticed that the runlevels were stated as a "convention", not a "standard". So I was mistaken, and would like to withdraw my previous point about there being a standard regarding this. Sorry about that. - -- Rodrigo Barbosa <rodrigob@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> "Quid quid Latine dictum sit, altum viditur" "Be excellent to each other ..." - Bill & Ted (Wyld Stallyns) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFCoA/FpdyWzQ5b5ckRAgZJAJ42jMI3fh/kqjUmWUssYA6CQH3DggCffa+p 02UCKDvGNkPxdgcdLv4zRsc= =rHKr -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----