-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, Jun 02, 2005 at 09:44:26PM -0500, Bryan J. Smith wrote: > On Thu, 2005-06-02 at 21:15 -0300, Rodrigo Barbosa wrote: > > So, there is no corelation, since Linux is not a GNU project :) (let the > > flamewar begin). > > Linux _is_ a GNU operating system. > And the design of Linux is heavily influenced by the preferred GNU > platform at the time he designed it over the first few years. > > That's what I was referring to, the "influence" on the design. Linux IS NOT a GNU operating system. Linux is Linus Pet Project, and thats all. Linux is not even an operating system, it is just a Kernel and, again, it is not a GNU Kernel. HURD is a GNU kernel. A Linux distribution (exception being Debian) is not more a GNU operating system than a X11/BSD/Name-Your-License Operating system. > > As I said, it is not that it doesn't apply to Solaris. It is > > just that I can't say that, since I don't know. > Solaris' run-levels don't match FC/RHL-based ones. ;-> Can you elaborate, please. > > Not from AT&T ehehehe > Then who makes the so-called "UNIX-like Standard" then? > We refer to them as System-V -- as in AT&T System V -- style init. > So at this point, I'm pretty certain there is no standard. I'll find it. Just need time to look for it. > > Okey. We are disgressing here. I agree with you that the inits are different. > > In every conceivable way. I'm just talking about runlevels ?) > > If you mean that run-levels exist, then yes, that's a System-V style > init. No disagreement there. > > But there is really no "standard" to what each level does -- although > most designate 6 for reboot, 0 for shutdown and 1 for single-user. That > is about the only commonality. Same answer. > > I will. Eventually. I just need time to look for it, but > > I'm in the middle of 2 big projects right now, so it might take > > a few days. > > Oh, no rush. I'd just like it for future reference when I run into > others. I don't mean to be skeptical, but unless it was AT&T's official > System-V init, I don't know how anyone could show it as lineage as the > "standard." Same answer :) []s - -- Rodrigo Barbosa <rodrigob@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> "Quid quid Latine dictum sit, altum viditur" "Be excellent to each other ..." - Bill & Ted (Wyld Stallyns) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFCn82vpdyWzQ5b5ckRAj2oAKCig7pm0RNgEMvnoq0GaYE2twZrdACfa7cN kME37O5LrOBFWbRxLTJo324= =ZCcs -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----