I'm not confused. I think the point is (and this has seemingly been a persistent issue since the RHEL rebuilds appeared on the scene) that Red Hat puts licensing restrictions on GPL software. And that strikes many of us as odd.
Preston
----------------------------------------
From: Simon Perreault <nomis80@xxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, June 02, 2005 2:13 PM
To: CentOS mailing list <centos@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Vote For CentOS :)
On Thursday 02 June 2005 16:01, Les Mikesell wrote:
> What kind of restriction would be excluded by the GPL if not ones that
> restrict copying, installing on additional machines, or redistribution?
Nobody's restricting anyone to do that with RHEL.
Is anybody else as confused as I am?
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20050602/1436974b/attachment.htm
