On Wed, 2005-07-27 at 10:49 -0700, Bryan J. Smith wrote:
> Phil Schaffner <Philip.R.Schaffner@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Well, Red Hat and many Fedora users would argue with that
> > characterization (the real serious bleeding is done in
> > development/rawhide and test releases), but FC4 certainly
> > seems to be causing more than the usual amount of blood-
> > loss for a FC final release.
>
> I really didn't even assert that first part, I tried to be
> brief.
And here I thought I was replying to Dave Gutteridge. :-P
In fact, I was replying to Dave.
> I just merely stated that, just like FC2, I was
...
> Why I got bounced on, I don't know.
Don't know either, but please don't implicitly accuse me of bouncing on
you when my message was a direct response to the OP. A thicker skin and
a longer fuse might be good things for such a prolific poster to
develop.
> I'm really sorry
> for being verbose at times, and I'm trying to curb that.
Can sympathize with the need to fight verbosity.
...
> It's a difficult balance to obtain, and I apologize for
> what may appear to be someone who "likes to hear himself
> talk." But in all honesty, that's not my intent. I'm
> really for discussions to find the root cause, proliferate
> understanding and many other things so people don't run
> into them again.
You definitely provide a lot of information, but apparently often more
than people want to see. That's what filters are for. :-)
Cheers,
Phil
