Re: New to CentOS, and wondering about application availability

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



Bryan J. Smith wrote:

>Dave Gutteridge <dave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>  
>
>>I'm the "he" in question, and for me there was no
>>    
>>
>"sticking"
>  
>
>>with FC3.  I only made the commitment to move from Windows
>>to Linux a few weeks ago,
>>    
>>
>
>And I can appreciate that.  That's why I tried to explain
>this.  I had _0_ issue with explaining this.  In fact, I
>blame Red Hat for the issue of not using revisions anymore --
>something that causes many innocent people to assume that a
>FC4 package will build on RHEL4 (and CentOS 4).
>
>My problem here is that someone else keeps jumping all over
>me anytime I try to explain something.  I guess I shouldn't
>be on this list then?  I thought the explaination was
>pertinent, given your post.  And based on this follow-up, I
>believe I was indeed correct in that assertion.
>  
>
The particular paragraph you chose to answer completely changes the 
context of the answer Bryan.

That paragraph was about Dave USING FC4 the distro and you went in there 
and said 'stick with FC3'. Anybody will draw the conclusion then that 
you mean use FC3 the distro especially with your next line about FC4 
adoption.

and you say this in spite of the fact that Dave has already said he is 
using Centos 4. What kind of response do you think you are going to get 
even if that was not your intention?

[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux