On 7/20/05, Bruno Delbono <bruno.s.delbono@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> Edward Croft wrote:
>
> > How would I find out if libdl.so.2 have _dl_lookup_symbol included? What is nm?
> > Forgive me, I am not a programmer anymore. I last programmed in COBOL
> > days. I am the systems person and we upgraded to CentOS from RHAS21
> > and now the programmer can't compile. He gave it to me to figure it
> > out. I understand makefiles, et al to a point that I have to compile
> > drivers and such, but my expertise is limited in this area. But always
> > willing to learn a new trick.
>
> How are you compiling the program? What are the arguments you're passing?
>
> _______________________________________________
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>
The Makefile looks like this:
include ../rapijni/Makefile
USPS_MODULES = standardizer_lib.c zip4_lnx.a
usps: $(USPS_MODULES)
gcc $(CFLAGS_JVM) -DUNIX -DDLL_BUILD -shared -o libusps_lib.so $^
standardizer: standardizer.c zip4_lnx.a
gcc296 -v -B /usr/lib/i386-redhat-linux3E/lib/ \
-B /usr/lib/i386-redhat-linux7/lib/ \
-I /usr/lib/i386-redhat-linux7/include \
-DUNIX $^ -o standardizer
usps_clean:
rm -f *.o *.so *test standardizer
And no, I cannot recompile the zip4_lnx.a program. That is the one
giving errors.
--
If the sane say the insane are insane,
What if the sane are insane?
Would that make the insane sane?
Explains a lot in Washington!
--E. Croft
