On Tue, 2005-07-19 at 08:43 +1000, John Newbigin wrote:
> I spent last week doing RH300 and I am now a RHCE!
Congrats! Glad you got to take the full RH300 track.
I sure wish I would have and I definitely will next time.
That exam will knock you on your butt if you don't prepare!
I got lucky on my RH302 (exam-only), I only got a 77% in a compulsory
RHCE subsection requirement that required a 70%, but 96.1% overall
(perfect 100% on everything else). I came close to only getting the
RHCT because of that one compulsory RHCE subsection. I know many others
that missed the RHCE, despite getting over a 90% total (and no section
less than an 85%).
My long story short, my new client (and rather short-lived, I left them
in the first 90 days citing, in writing, repeated contract violations
despite warnings) pushed me to get my MCSE and RHCE. I did half my MCSE
(the MCSA) at lunch every day that week, in between working almost 50
hours. I then drove 450 miles overnight Thursday to take my RHCE (exam-
only) on the brand new RHL9 exam on Friday.
And my new client wondered why I didn't have the cert when I came back
(duh, it takes a week to find out, at least when I took it!).
In retrospect, "cert-whoring" (what I called it) for a few clients was
the best thing for actually getting more work. I hate certs in general,
but it's the stupid thing that self-markets (sadly enough). Sigh.
--
Bryan J. Smith b.j.smith@xxxxxxxx
---------------------------------------------------------------------
It is mathematically impossible for someone who makes more than you
to be anything but richer than you. Any tax rate that penalizes them
will also penalize you similarly (to those below you, and then below
them). Linear algebra, let alone differential calculus or even ele-
mentary concepts of limits, is mutually exclusive with US journalism.
So forget even attempting to explain how tax cuts work. ;->
