Re: Fix passwd/shadow/group files? -- network architecture is always piecemeal

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



>People thing in single products/projects, not breaking down things into their multiple technologies.
>
>That's all I meant by "artificially limiting."
>
>  
>
Well, MS made extensions to its LDAP implementation by giving it new RPC 
calls for its special MS Kerberos data did it not?

So if I don't break it down, how else would I point out that ADS DC on 
open source is not possible unless these extensions are also available  
in open source implementations of these technoluogies?

>>Even if you think you're right, leave some room for the
>>possibility you're not.
>>    
>>
>
>It has nothing to do with right/wrong.
>There is just this farce out there that you must have ADS or every native Windows Server 2003 interface to have quality Windows client management.
>  
>
Right, but you got me interested in whether an actual open source 
solution to native Windows MS-Kerberos account management exists when 
you say that Samba 3.0 could be an ADS DC.

>Various teams, including Samba, have done a wonderful job of reverse engineering many.
>
>But the reality is that if you can avoid deploying services that require MS' sprawling (and sometimes self-incomaptible) schema,
>then you don't need native MS ADS DCs.
>Enterprises do it all-the-time.
>  
>
and native MS account management on Unix?

[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux