Non-CentOS related arguments off-list please

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On Sat, 2 Jul 2005, Bryan J. Smith wrote:

> On Sat, 2005-07-02 at 15:22 -0400, Lamar Owen wrote:
> > And discussing them would be more on-topic if there were a CentOS/SPARC64, 
> > which would be nice to no end.
> 
> It's funny where we've gone since Bruno's post, and the couple of back'n
> forths after that before I (let alone yourself) entered.

Yes, and it would be nice if we can keep the off-topic stuff off the list.

Even though it contains a lot of information someone might find useful, 
most of the people on the list consider it noise and it brings down the 
signal-to-noise ratio of the list.

It happened now 3 or 4 times that we got an overly long off-topic 
discussion (flamewar even) which most of the subscribers are really not 
interested in. (I hope I can speak for most here anyway)

Keep it CentOS related please, as soon as you have a non-CentOS related 
argument or monologue, keep it off-list.

PS This is a general statement, not targetting Bryan specifically here.

Thanks,
--   dag wieers,  dag@xxxxxxxxxx,  http://dag.wieers.com/   --
[all I want is a warm bed and a kind word and unlimited power]

[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux