Thanks for the followup, Russ. I know I looked at the site during this experience - but probably whatever misled me was from some ancient article i found via google. Sorry to impugn your work. On Thu, Jun 30, 2005 at 11:11:31PM -0400, R P Herrold wrote: > On Thu, 30 Jun 2005, Dan Pritts wrote: > > >On Thu, Jun 30, 2005 at 12:03:29PM -0500, alex@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > >>http://www.rpm.org/max-rpm/ > > > >I am pretty sure I looked at this site while putting together the > >"fakejava" spec file - and was misled by it. Unfortunately > >I don't remember details. > > > >Just double checked this - its copyright date is 2000. Things have > >changed. > > not really, and I _do_ follow the details closely and have for > years; I update it as it falls out of date, but leave it alone > when it is stable -- and the 'hints and kinks' sub-page is > full of the relevant post MaxRPM exceptions. > > - Russ Herrold, RPM.org site editor > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos danno -- dan pritts - systems administrator - internet2 734/352-4953 office 734/834-7224 mobile