Am Mo, den 21.02.2005 schrieb Alex White um 16:08:
Hi Alex!
> Haven't seen you around in a long time. What's the haps man?
A bit busy in the last weeks - and did post enough in the last year on
the Fedora list ;)
> Here's a side question in relation to the shell. Which
> convention is more correct, or does it even matter. /bin/false
> or /bin/nologin?
With the /sbin/nologin shell you get a feedback that the account login
is disabled. /bin/false is just silent. What you use depends on specific
target. For login-less FTP user account for example I prefer /bin/false.
Alexander
--
Alexander Dalloz | Enger, Germany | new address - new key: 0xB366A773
legal statement: http://www.uni-x.org/legal.html
Fedora GNU/Linux Core 2 (Tettnang) on Athlon kernel 2.6.10-1.14_FC2smp
Serendipity 16:20:38 up 3:29, 17 users, 1.15, 1.31, 1.19
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
Url : http://lists.caosity.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20050221/87e2bb5b/attachment.bin
