Ho Chaw Ming wrote: >On legal grounds they have to object. If not they lose the rights to the >trademark if they ever need to go to court to fight a case. Their lawyers >would be the one jumping up and down and for good reason. They have to keep >their trademark (or lose the rights to it by simply not objecting others >usage of it) > > > I disagree. If they were only interested in protecting their trademark, they wouldn't have thrown in that crazy line about not linking to their website without permission. I don't get it. Red Hat has been pissing off their community for about a year now. Would somebody care to explain to me how that makes good business sense? I guess that Microsoft is ecstatic. If Red Hat pisses off enough customers, it weakens linux as a whole. Just my $0.02, Ben