lee@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: >>They would really prefer that you cease operations, discontinue your >>product, and force everyone to purchase their (overpriced) products. > > > "Overpriced" is subjective. My company has happily standardized on RHEL. When there is no option which does not include their "support", which I can obtain locally at far better prices, and with far, far better response times, I consider it overpriced. It is subjective. > >>I no longer recommend that company to my clients for any Linux work, >>because they are completely out of touch with the Linux movement, and >>Linux' core values. I now happily recommend any of their competitors >>when my clients ask me what distros. I do recommend CentOS for most >>everyone. > > > I think that's a bit short-sighted. Exactly where would CentOS and the > other clones be without Red Hat's continued operations. And would Red Hat be "the standard linux distribution" without the people who promoted their brand because it was reasonably priced at $79 per package, and who have now been abandoned? Probably not... CentOS will continue, even if RedHat is purchased by Microsoft and absorbed by the borg... -Scott