On Tue, 8 Feb 2005, Ted Kaczmarek wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-02-07 at 11:43 -0500, John Hinton wrote:
> > I'm running bind in a chroot environment. It seems that since the Redhat
> > snafu which wrecked bind (yes, I had caching nameserver running as well
> > but not anymore) I have been having problem with my slave nameservers
> > retrieving updates from the master.
> >
> > Looking at the zone records, some are owned by root, some are owned by
> > named. I'm now confused as to what the ownership should be and what
> > permissions should be assigned. Could someone shed some light on this?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > John Hinton
> What user are you running named as?
>
> What user is generating the zone files?
>
>
> Ted
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@xxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.caosity.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>
Had the same issue
On your DNS slaves you need to change your named.conf
file to have directory prefix of slaves
file "slaves/somefile.db"
Then things works with the slave zone transfers.
//Chris
