On Sat, 2005-12-31 at 14:38 +0100, Maciej ?enczykowski wrote:
> extras/SRPMS/ipvsadm-1.24-6.src.rpm: (SHA1) DSA sha1 md5 (GPG) NOT OK (MISSING KEYS: GPG#db42a60e)
> (and ipvsadm seems to
> have a signature unlike all the other packages...)
What's worse is that it's a *Red Hat* key...
[ignacio@ignacio ~]$ gpg /etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY
pub 1024D/DB42A60E 1999-09-23 Red Hat, Inc <security@xxxxxxxxxx>
sub 2048g/961630A2 1999-09-23
[ignacio@ignacio ~]$
--
Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams <ivazquez@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
http://centos.ivazquez.net/
gpg --keyserver hkp://subkeys.pgp.net --recv-key 38028b72
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20051231/5edba766/attachment.bin
