Benjamin Smith <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Client is cash-poor, in particular, is really feeling the
> squeeze from the death of the dial-up industry.
How much does it cost them per hour of downtime?
If it's enough, then spending $200 to build a backup,
Socket-754 system of just a case, PS, mainboard, CPU and
memory is well worth it.
> Saving $3,000 while still providing reasonable options for
> "worst case" can provide a lot of brownie points...
Saving $2,800, $200 less, and reducing the downtime to
minutes, instead of hours or even days in procuring new
equipment, is a far better argument IMHO.
> in any event, I've done a fairly large number of hardware
> swaps between P3/P4/Athlon systems, and haven't had much
> trouble with it.
On Linux, yes, to a point. Especially with the new 2.6
kernel, where the i686 kernel dynamically loads PPro/P2, P3,
P4, Athlon/Opteron, etc... optimizations. Otherwise, I used
to see people pull their hair out on 2.4, when they switched
out a disk installed on an Athlon for a P4. Kernel panic
(due to the Athlon kernel ;-).
> When the next Opteron server comes in, after I've set it
up,
> I'll test it out on an Athlon/64 system I can borrow for a
> bit and see what issues I run into.
Or you could just spend $200 and give your client a sub-hour
recovery time, instead of hours/days.
--
Bryan J. Smith Professional, Technical Annoyance b.j.smith@xxxxxxxx http://thebs413.blogspot.com
----------------------------------------------------
*** Speed doesn't kill, difference in speed does ***
