Opteron, Athlon/64, and disaster recovery

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



Benjamin Smith <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Now, we're moving to Opteron-based servers, and I just was
> wondering if it's reasonable to expect that, in a
worst-case
> scenario, we could get an Athlon/64 system locally, and
have
> it work, even if not optimally. 

Yes, Athlon 64 and Opteron are virtually identical from that
standpoint.  The only issues you'd have are
chipset/peripheral, just like any other change.

> Just checking the accuracy of the data behind my decisions.
> (I've turned down Xeon servers for this reason) 

Yes, there is less difference between Opteron and Athlon 64
than Xeon and Pentium 4.

-- Bryan

P.S.  Any reason you don't keep around a spare Socket-754
Sempron 64 system then?  I mean, they are _dirt_cheap_ (like
$300 for case/MB/CPU/memory).


-- 
Bryan J. Smith     Professional, Technical Annoyance                      b.j.smith@xxxxxxxx      http://thebs413.blogspot.com
----------------------------------------------------
*** Speed doesn't kill, difference in speed does ***

[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux