How to select a motherboard -- CPU architectures and chipsets

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



Feizhou <feizhou@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Eh? http://www.nvidia.com/object/IO_16450.html
> They specifically highlight NCQ on page 4 for their SATA
> implementation.

According to the SATA/libata status page:  
  http://linux.yyz.us/sata/sata-status.html#nvidia  

I guess they were talking about the MCP-03, instead of the
newer MCP-04?  In any case, I'm not getting NCQ support on my
nForce4 serieschipsets under Windows.  I guess some just
don't include it?

> Well, they are not talking about ATA...

ATA = SATA
You can have NCQ on parallel ATA too.
It's just a physical/datalink layer difference.

> they are talking about SCSI like tag command queueing
> on their SATA side of things,

Between the drive and [software] host, individually.  Then
you use [software] host AHCI to control and schedule up to 32
drives.

My point is that it's still not a hardware-based host
adapter.  It's only the end-device component, with a software
host.

> you know, Native Command Queueing. No, not NForce 2 or 3
> or 4 but Nforce 4 Ultra and above (Nforce4 SLI, Nforce Pro
> 2xxx)

Yeah, it seems the regular nForce 4 and at least the nForce
410 (not sure about the 430) don't have it.

> Jeff does not get anything. He does not list Nvidia
> implementations of their SATA controllers as 'open' like
the
> Intel AHCI and Silicon Image 3112 among others.

I stand corrected then.
As I said, I heard 2nd hand.

-- 
Bryan J. Smith                | Sent from Yahoo Mail
mailto:b.j.smith@xxxxxxxx     |  (please excuse any
http://thebs413.blogspot.com/ |   missing headers)

[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux