Huge OO.org packages installed by default

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On Wed, 2005-12-14 at 01:34 -0200, Rodrigo Barbosa wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> On Tue, Dec 13, 2005 at 09:11:44PM -0600, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> > > > Yeah that looks like it. Why-oh-why couldn't RH do the smart thing and 
> > > > split it out into language packages like Mandriva? I'll have to remember 
> > > > to set my partition size when installing RH distros to 7 or 10GB, not 5.
> > > 
> > > Red Hat does so since Fedora Core 4.
> > 
> > Right ... remember that you are comparing CentOS-4 (based on FC3) with
> > the latest release of Mandriva.  They are doing it different now too.
> 
> It is more than that.
> 
> I remember talking to Jeff Johnson a few years ago. I was working at Conectiva,
> and contributing code to rpm. The subject of our discussion was package
> splitting.
> 
> Conectiva was known for splitting everything into multiple packages.
> glibc alone was separed in 40+ packages.
> 
> Jeff said that they, at RedHat, didn't agree with package splitting.
> It makes maintenance harder, installing more confusing for the
> users and, to quote him "harddisk space is cheap".
> 
> So I have to say that this issue goes way back, and is not as
> recent as FC4. I don't remember the exact date of this discussion, but
> I think it was 2000 or 2001.
----
Upstream took all of the languages out of main packaging in Fedora Core
4 and obviously intends to keep doing that. Too late for CentOS 4 but
future releases will split Oo

Craig


[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux