x86_64 kernel compilation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On Thu, 2005-12-08 at 08:26 +0000, John Logsdon wrote: 
> If I can squeeze a message between the discussions on security (:-)) I
> have been trying to compile a kernel on an x86_64 box under CentOS4.1 and
> now 4.2.  
> 
> The problem is that neither make xconfig or make gconfig work:
> 
> make gconfig
> *
> * Unable to find the GTK+ installation. Please make sure that
> * the GTK+ 2.0 development package is correctly installed...
> * You need gtk+-2.0, glib-2.0 and libglade-2.0.
> *   
> make[1]: *** [scripts/kconfig/.tmp_gtkcheck] Error 1
> make: *** [gconfig] Error 2
> 
> and a similar message for xconfig:
> 
> make xconfig
>   HOSTLD  scripts/kconfig/qconf
> /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lqt
> collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
> make[1]: *** [scripts/kconfig/qconf] Error 1
> make: *** [xconfig] Error 2
> 
> Yet I have the following libraries installed:
> 
> compat-glibc.i386                        1:2.3.2-95.30          installed       
> compat-glibc.x86_64                      1:2.3.2-95.30          installed       
> compat-glibc-headers.x86_64              1:2.3.2-95.30          installed       
> glibc.i686                               2.3.4-2.13             installed       
> glibc.x86_64                             2.3.4-2.13             installed       
> glibc-common.x86_64                      2.3.4-2.13             installed       
> glibc-devel.x86_64                       2.3.4-2.13             installed       
> glibc-devel.i386                         2.3.4-2.13             installed       
> glibc-headers.x86_64                     2.3.4-2.13             installed       
> glibc-kernheaders.x86_64                 2.4-9.1.98.EL          installed       
> glibc-utils.x86_64                       2.3.4-2.13             installed       
> gtk+.i386                                1:1.2.10-33            installed       
> gtk+.x86_64                              1:1.2.10-33.centos4    installed       
> gtk+-devel.x86_64                        1:1.2.10-33.centos4    installed       
> gtk-engines.i386                         1:0.12-6.el4           installed       
> gtk-engines.x86_64                       1:0.12-6.el4           installed       
> gtk2.x86_64                              2.4.13-18              installed       
> gtk2.i386                                2.4.13-18              installed       
> gtk2-devel.x86_64                        2.4.13-18              installed       
> gtk2-engines.x86_64                      2.2.0-7.el4            installed       
> gtk2-engines.i386                        2.2.0-7.el4            installed       
> libglade2.i386                           2.4.0-5                installed       
> libglade2.x86_64                         2.4.0-5                installed       
> pygtk2.x86_64                            2.4.0-1                installed       
> pygtk2-libglade.x86_64                   2.4.0-1                installed       
> 
> 
> Since menuconfig is totally unusable, I am quite stuck.  I have regularly
> compiled on an x86 box with virtually identical installation and I have
> compared the libraries but can't see what I have missed.

I use this all the time and it works OK for me.  Been using it for at
least 5 years and it is not as pretty as the other 2 options, but works
fine :)

> 
> The kernel version is 2.6.14.3 which is the latest stable but this happens
> with older kernels.  There have been suggestions of various patches to a
> makefile which I have tried but to no avail.  So I think it may be a
> library issue.
> 
> So can anyone with an x86_64 box on which they have successfully compiled
> a kernel post me their output from:
> 
> yum list | egrep gtk\|glibc\|glade | grep installed
> 
> ... or even the complete yum list (privately to save bandwidth!)
> 
There is a bug in the code :)

This fixed it for me:

http://www.fedoraforum.org/forum/archive/index.php/t-466.html

(that is, edit the file $BUILD_DIR/scripts/kconfig/Makefile and search
for  print-multi-os-directory and take out the space for between:

$(HOSTCXX)   and -print-multi-os-directory 

so that the lines look like that posted in the above link.
--------------
I also submitted this as a confirmed bug so that others can find it at
bugs.centos.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20051208/f3edee46/attachment.bin

[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux