Preston Crawford <me@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I didn't say it was you. Although, my inbox is filled with
> about 50% responses from you, so maybe you're onto
something
> there.
Maybe _now_, but not _earlier_. Consider the chronology
here. ;->
> Of course. And in fact you've made some good points that I
> agree with with regards to using LTO storage, how to share
> printers, etc.
Whether you agree with me or not, it was a wound for me to
see you say this yet again -- almost exactly like you have
said on-list and off-list several times now.
So is it me, even before I respond? Think about that before
you refer to the "50%" next time. ;->
> I was just pointing out my opinion on why the list was so
> overtaken with traffic lately.
I think it's time, now more than ever, to adopt the
"Linux/Sun Managers" format. It would let these little "I
know best" tit-tat-toe discussions and tangents stay
off-line, and *1* person would summarize it all, the original
question poster.
Either that or a separate "practices" list. This discussion
was _definitely_ a candidate.
> No. Sorry to disappoint.
I refer again to the "50%" above. ;->
--
Bryan J. Smith | Sent from Yahoo Mail
mailto:b.j.smith@xxxxxxxx | (please excuse any
http://thebs413.blogspot.com/ | missing headers)
