I disagree on slower/older hardware I'd be more inclinded to use dovecot due
to it's extreme indexing and caching of message parts, logins, etc. (which
it all 100% tunable though it's simple conf file)
Side note: Really if your looking for a drop in solution that simple to
setup, maintain, uses 100% virutal users, and has countless & simple ways to
addon anti-virus,spam, etc. I highly recommend XMail as the SMTP server.
-- Chris L. Franklin --
----- Original Message -----
From: "Aleksandar Milivojevic" <alex@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "CentOS mailing list" <centos@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2005 12:33 AM
Subject: Re: Planning Mail Server (with low resources)
> Rodrigo Barbosa wrote:
>
>> You might also want to change Cyrus-imapd to something simpler, like
>> wu-imapd, since it should take less resources from the machine. Then
>> again,
>> I have very little experience with cyrus, since I either use wu or
>> courrier.
>
> Cyrus needs less resources than wu-imapd. Each time you open mailbox,
> wu-imapd needs to read it from beggining to the end from the disk, and
> alocate possibly large chunks of memory as long as you keep connection
> open. Cyrus will simply consult its internal database. Huge difference
> in speed and load on machine. So, the slower/older your hardware is, the
> more inclined you should be to run cyrus.
> _______________________________________________
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>
________________________________________________________________________
This email was scanned by the server at NomadCF.com, And has been deemed
clean of invaild and or dangerous email attachment type and virus'.
Although this is by no means a guarantee.
________________________________________________________________________
