> <strong opinion=ON> > It still isn't AMD, so it still ain't x86-64. Intel calls it IA-64 aka > EM64T for a reason, it's not the full x86-64 ISA. So as far as I'm > concerned, you're really no better off on a server whether you run i386 > or x86-64 on EM64T -- especially for anything I/O intensive. > </strong opinion> I thought IA64 was Itanium only?
CentOS and Dell Support
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: CentOS and Dell Support
- From: maze at cela.pl (Maciej Żenczykowski)
- Date: Mon Dec 5 00:16:26 2005
- In-reply-to: <1133740690.5010.198.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- References: <fa37e76f0512041247m2fb8360bq2fd5557cab41a5b6@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1133736933.20350.3.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1133740690.5010.198.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Follow-Ups:
- CentOS and Dell Support -- typo (s/IA-64/IA-32e/g)
- From: Bryan J. Smith
- CentOS and Dell Support -- typo (s/IA-64/IA-32e/g)
- References:
- CentOS and Dell Support
- From: Matt Morgan
- CentOS and Dell Support
- From: Craig White
- CentOS and Dell Support
- From: Bryan J. Smith
- CentOS and Dell Support
- Prev by Date: CentOS and Dell Support
- Next by Date: CentOS and Dell Support -- typo (s/IA-64/IA-32e/g)
- Previous by thread: CentOS and Dell Support
- Next by thread: CentOS and Dell Support -- typo (s/IA-64/IA-32e/g)
- Index(es):
 |