DAG repo problem (continuation)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



Henk van Lingen wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 05, 2005 at 12:05:01AM +0100, Ralph Angenendt wrote:
>   > See
>   > <http://lists.rpmforge.net/pipermail/users/2005-November/000110.html>
>   > (Dominik already has answers from the users list, but this might
>   > clarify it for others also).
> 
>   Hi Ralph,
> 
>   This suggests that that list has had postings last days. Are the archives
>   by any change delayed?
>   (I'm asking 'cause maybe here also 'the admins may not know about it')

Nope, no answer to that yet. But yes, the list has postings - and so do
the archives:

<http://lists.rpmforge.net/pipermail/users/2005-December/thread.html>
has the mails from December.

Ralph
-- 
Ralph Angenendt......ra@xxxxxxxxxxxx | .."Text processing has made it possible
Bayerischer Rundfunk...HA-Multimedia | ....to right-justify any idea, even one
Rundfunkplatz 1........80300 M?nchen | .which cannot be justified on any other
Tl:089.5900.16023..Fx:089.5900.16240 | ..........grounds." -- J. Finnegan, USC
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20051205/dde1cb9f/attachment.bin

[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux