Bowie Bailey <Bowie_Bailey@xxxxxxx> wrote: > I interpreted that to mean that their i386 build would not > run on x86_64. >From what I saw, most of these were because of Java, Sleepycat DB and other software that were made in x86_64 form. If you load the i386 versions, they will work. I had RHDS/FDS 7.1 (at least components of it -- I didn't test everything) running on FC/RHEL x86_64, as long as I loaded the i386 versions. They probably say this because it isn't straight-forward, I'll admit. -- Bryan J. Smith | Sent from Yahoo Mail mailto:b.j.smith@xxxxxxxx | (please excuse any http://thebs413.blogspot.com/ | missing headers)
LDAP Implementations (was: Linking against a specifi c Berkeley DB install)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: LDAP Implementations (was: Linking against a specifi c Berkeley DB install)
- From: thebs413 at earthlink.net (Bryan J. Smith)
- Date: Fri Dec 2 16:57:58 2005
- In-reply-to: <4766EEE585A6D311ADF500E018C154E3021333B3@BNIFEX>
- References:
- LDAP Implementations (was: Linking against a specifi c Berkeley DB install)
- From: Bowie Bailey
- LDAP Implementations (was: Linking against a specifi c Berkeley DB install)
- Prev by Date: system clock uses UTC selection on centos install
- Next by Date: Tyan S2891 and CentOS -- 6, 8, 10+ PCI busses in today's new systems
- Previous by thread: LDAP Implementations (was: Linking against a specifi c Berkeley DB install)
- Next by thread: slow responding firewall server
- Index(es):
 |