"Bryan J. Smith" <thebs413@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Same reason they do for MS Windows Server, Sun Solaris, > etc... And, I should have mentioned, remember that Red Hat Enterprise Linux WS is also available in volume as Red Hat Desktop. -- Bryan J. Smith | Sent from Yahoo Mail mailto:b.j.smith@xxxxxxxx | (please excuse any http://thebs413.blogspot.com/ | missing headers)
why was LILO removed from centOS 4.2?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: why was LILO removed from centOS 4.2?
- From: thebs413 at earthlink.net (Bryan J. Smith)
- Date: Fri Dec 2 03:13:12 2005
- In-reply-to: <20051202031217.79614.qmail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- References:
- why was LILO removed from centOS 4.2?
- From: Bryan J. Smith
- why was LILO removed from centOS 4.2?
- Prev by Date: why was LILO removed from centOS 4.2?
- Next by Date: why was LILO removed from centOS 4.2?
- Previous by thread: why was LILO removed from centOS 4.2?
- Next by thread: why was LILO removed from centOS 4.2?
- Index(es):
 |