LDAP Implementations (was: Linking against a specifi c Berkeley DB install)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



From: Bryan J. Smith [mailto:thebs413@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> 
> Bowie Bailey <Bowie_Bailey@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> > It is an interesting choice.  It supports multi-master
> > replication which I will need and has some GUI management
> > utilities.
> > Anyone know of any problems with it?
> 
> Only that many people on this list have been ignorant of what
> NsDS is in the past, even though it's in major use --
> especially before even the appearance of ADS in Windows 2000,
> let alone how well it does integrate it for ADS-to/from-NsDS
> synchronization.  I.e., NsDS can run on Windows too, and
> Fedora makes those binaries available.
> 
> I don't know if I'd trust the FDS 1.0 "open source" version
> yet, as it's missing components last time I checked, but the
> FDS binaries?  100% NsDS 7.1 -- Linux, Windows, Solaris,
> etc...

I'm not resistant to changing programs.  We are in a testing mode now
and I have barely even started looking into how to configure
multi-master replication in OpenLDAP.

The showstopper at the moment is that FDS 1.0 does not currently
support x86_64, which is what our production servers will be running.

Bowie

[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux