why was LILO removed from centOS 4.2?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



The question was "WHY", the answer seems to be "because 'they' didn't like lilo"

1: Inadequate arch support in LILO
2: RAID1 boot problems with GRUB not deemed sufficiently important to leave 
    in LILO until said problem is resolved.

For ServerCD 4.3: 
1: Please support i586 in the install.  
    Method: if arch is i686, install i686; if it's i386->i586, install i386.

Brian Brunner
brian.t.brunner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
(610)796-5838

>>> mail-lists@xxxxxxxxx 12/01/05 11:00AM >>>
Aleksandar Milivojevic wrote:

> Probably the LILO RPM missing on the CD.  If you rebuild CD image with 
> LILO RPM
> included, it might work.
> 

if you can verify this, could you file this as an issue at 
http://bugs.centos.org/ - I'll make sure the situation is rectified in 
time for ServerCD 4.3

thanks

- K

_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx 
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

*******************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
the system manager.

This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept
for the presence of computer viruses.

www.hubbell.com - Hubbell Incorporated

[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux