On Tue, 2005-08-30 at 19:21 +0900, Dave Gutteridge wrote: > >Rather than editing /etc/fstab and adding a lot of mount flags to the > >mix, start with the basics. Can you do the following as root: > >mount -t vfat /dev/hda1 /mnt/windows > > > > > [root@localhost ~]# mount -t vfat /dev/hda1 /mnt/windows > mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/hda1, > or too many mounted file systems > > >If yes, then it is a matter of working out the proper flags. If not, > >then the file system could be corrupt. When you try the mount command > >above, do you see any errors in /var/log/messages or dmesg output? > > > > > > This is in /var/log/messages: > Aug 30 19:16:50 localhost kernel: FAT: invalid first entry of FAT > (0xffffff8 != 0x1) > Aug 30 19:16:50 localhost kernel: VFS: Can't find a valid FAT filesystem > on dev hda1. > > So it thinks it's not a valid FAT system. It seems to work okay in > Windows... is there a possibility that there are different kinds of FAT32? > > Dave > Is this a Windows partition? If so, I would boot in Windows XP an make sure you can read the partition in Windows and run chkdsk on it via Windows XP to start with. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part Url : http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20050830/2fc429b2/attachment.bin