"principle" I believe is the applicable word here....
:-)
Scot L. Harris wrote:
>On Tue, 2005-08-23 at 23:04, Mike McCarty wrote:
>
>
>>Bryan J. Smith wrote:
>>
>>
>>>On Tue, 2005-08-23 at 19:03 -0500, Mike McCarty wrote:
>>>
>>>
>
>
>
>>After the engineers complained that there would be a massive
>>editing effort to modify *comments*, the lawyers of Company A
>>and Company B got together, studied the law, and concluded
>>that, to comply with the law, Company A must perforce modify
>>all documents, including non-disclosed proprietary trade
>>secret source, even in comments, so that the now trademarked
>>term did not appear anywhere.
>>
>>The engineers gritted their teeth, and did a massive search
>>and edit to modify the source.
>>
>>
>
>This sounds like you had really bad lawyers (shades of gray I know) that
>acceded to the request of the other company. Probably as a quick way to
>just settle the complaint. In other words it would have cost more to
>defend against the complaint than it cost to give in. :)
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>CentOS mailing list
>CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
>http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20050824/b20d46ee/attachment.htm
