Re: Linux Trademarked?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



Bryan J. Smith wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-08-24 at 03:39 +0200, Dag Wieers wrote:
> 
>>Not as much as you have implied though >:)
> 
> 
> Oh com'mon Dag.
> 
> Just because I was the first guy who started defending Red Hat on this
> list doesn't mean that they weren't warranted many times prior.  And I
> have noted that much of the Red Hat slants have gone away as a result.
> 
> Although I _am_ sorry I read too much into Mike's post.
> 
> 

No problem. No offence meant or taken, I'm sure.

OTOH, over on FC echo I was recently accused of being willing
to argue with a doorknob :-)

Mike
-- 
p="p=%c%s%c;main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}";main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}
This message made from 100% recycled bits.
You have found the bank of Larn.
I can explain it for you, but I can't understand it for you.
I speak only for myself, and I am unanimous in that!

[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux