Choosing to put CentOS in terms of itself ...

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On Thu, 18 Aug 2005, Bryan J. Smith wrote:

> Preston Crawford <me@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Regardless of whether Red Hat deserves credit for their
>> work, that's their user experience.
>
> If you go all the way back to even the "vote for CentOS"
> thread, I have _never_ even suggested such.  In fact, I
> differed with those who did.
>
> 100% of the reason why I even bring up the development
> history is the same reason I bring up anything else, to help
> someone avoid the assumptions and run into the same issues.
> Now I've done it enough times now, and I will avoid doing it
> again.

I think it's helpful. Someone should write a "where do babies come 
from?"-style FAQ that deals with CentOS/RHEL/Fedora/Red Hat, etc. so 
people understand the virtuous cycle that is the constellation of Red Hat 
and RHEL-derived products.

Preston

[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux