Robert Hanson <roberth@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> my last hardware cycle was between the 1.2.13 and 2.0.X
> linux kernel stages believe it or not... and back then...
I started with 0.96 and Yggdrasil.
> well, i always hand rolled a kernel optimized to the bare
> bones servers i would take and hand build.
I pretty much switched to modules/initrd kernels with kernel
2.2+ as well.
> Bryan, i noticed and noted the SATA /dev/sda etc type
> device assignment issues.
> ummmmm will SATA always have SCSI type device assignment or
> has/will a new assignment be created?
It's not SATA per se, but the maintainers. E.g., nVidia and
volunteers maintain the GPL nv_sata driver.
At this time, libata support is still forthcoming, so the ATA
codebase lacks most drivers. There are only a few.
> i imagine that it would go so an ATA type device assignment
> eventually wouldnt it?
Yes. The best "status page" I know of is here:
http://linux.yyz.us/sata/sata-status.html
You'll note some say "not suited for libata" meaning they are
not ATA-like. E.g., 3Ware's Escalade 8000/9000 series may
use SATA devices, but the kernel only talks to its on-board
ASIC intelligence, not the SATA channels.
But others, like the nVidia SATA in the nForce, have beta
libata support. I suspect they will become part of the ATA
codebase and you will use "hd" instead of "sd" (as currently
with "nv_sata") in the future.
--
Bryan J. Smith | Sent from Yahoo Mail
mailto:b.j.smith@xxxxxxxx | (please excuse any
http://thebs413.blogspot.com/ | missing headers)
