Johnny Hughes wrote:
>On Wed, 2005-08-10 at 22:05 -0500, William A. Mahaffey III wrote:
>
>
>>Karl S. Katzke wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>First of all, I just want to say *again* how happy I am with CentOS.
>>>Across our boxes and our clients boxes, we're running it on more than
>>>20 machines at the moment and it's by far the most painless OS to
>>>administer in detail that I've ever used. (Of course, I'm an old Slak
>>>hat, but ...) Thanks so much to the community and the maintainers.
>>>
>>>We've recently run into a problem with a dual-opteron system that is
>>>running LTSP and serving up X and Firefox to a whole bunch of diskless
>>>clients. We're using the x86-64 build of CentOS, with the appropriate
>>>Firefox package. The client users have all been asking for Flash,
>>>since many websites are unusable without Flash these days ... but
>>>there's no 64-bit build of the Flash plugin. (Thanks, Macromedia! You
>>>suck!)
>>>
>>>What's the best way to provide Flash (and maybe Java?) with Firefox on
>>>this server box? How big will the performance hit be from running
>>>non-64 bit packages? Any specific tips & hints?
>>>
>>>Thanks!
>>>
>>>-Karl Katzke
>>>_______________________________________________
>>>
>>>
>>
>>You could run the 32-bit Firefox & 32-bit plugins, they are *supposed*
>>to work seamlessly under the x86_64 OS. YMMV & all that. I have seen
>>much talk about this on the SuSE AMD64 list, and this recommendation has
>>floated out more than once.
>>
>>
>>
>Right ... the only option would be to remove the x86_64 firefox and
>install the i386 one ... but that might require MANY other i386
>libraries. (I can't test it here).
>
>Tell them to get over it is another option :)
>
>Should not be a huge performance issue ... at least I haven't noticed
>any earth shattering performance enhancements between the x86_64 and
>i386 distros when installed on x86_64 machines (that one could feel via
>the GUI screen).
>
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>_______________________________________________
>CentOS mailing list
>CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
>http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>
>
From the SuSE list, I don't think there are any performance issues.
There *can* be problems getting all libraries correctly located (32-bit
vs. 64-bit) ....
--
William A. Mahaffey III
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Remember, ignorance is bliss, but
willful ignorance is LIBERALISM !!!!
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20050811/c4de7d5d/attachment.htm
