Johnny Hughes wrote: >> > > Wrong or Right is not relevant It may not be wrong, but I think is is not good... or at least, it could be better. > > it is what it is > > CentOS has been doing things the same way since it's inception ... CentOS-3 & CentOS-4 do this. CentOS-2 & RedHat just keep putting updates in the updates. It does not matter what you install from, all updates is always completely up to date. I would like to see CentOS 3 & 4 change to the CentOS-2/RedHat approach. I have gathered some thoughts on this and related issues here: http://www.byteclub.net/wiki/index.php?title=Manage_RPM_based_updates John. > > >>there were a lot of talks about it here: >> >>When you install CentOS x.0 and you run "yum update" you get finaly >>lates CentOS X.Y ... >> >>CentOS X.4 is CentOS X.0 + all released updates ... >> >> >>and from your answer it seems it is gone >>CentOS 4.1 have diferent versions of SW then CentOS 4.0 + updates >> >> >>I know CentOS depend on RH releases but presented strategy is brain dead >> >>I have several servers with fixed setup and I have local mirror. >>Now it seems I have to mirror not only "updates" but "updates" and "base". >> >>Before half a year there was talk about high bandwith, so lets download >>all the stuff. > > If you want to have a local mirror ... then you need to > mirror /centos/4/ > > it will always be up2date > > This is the same with CentOS 3 and it is absolutely not a change to the > way we have been doing things for almost 2 years > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos -- John Newbigin Computer Systems Officer Faculty of Information and Communication Technologies Swinburne University of Technology Melbourne, Australia http://www.ict.swin.edu.au/staff/jnewbigin