William Warren <hescominsoon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Ok i am closing this thread. time for a new one..:) You could have just appended the subject as I did: "RE: Caching nameserver -- BIND(?) caching/forwarding server" http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2005-August/009628.html Maybe with something like: "RE: Caching nameserver -- BIND with internal DNS That way the "subject sorting" mail-clients would still see the relationship. Especially if you reply and Message-ID is still kept intact, so it threads properly too for both proper mail readers as well as Mailman's Pipermail. -- Bryan J. Smith | Sent from Yahoo Mail mailto:b.j.smith@xxxxxxxx | (please excuse any http://thebs413.blogspot.com/ | missing headers)