} That's why I append the subject to nscd, but now I've
} responded and changed it again here. We started to go off on
} "nscd," but then we came back to the BIND or another DNS
} caching/fowarding server**.
}
} -- Bryan
}
} **[OT]NOTE: My primary reason for doing this is that it
} makes it easier to find discussions in the archives, while
} still reserving the "sort by subject" in the mail readers
} too. It's the same logic that was used prior for UseNet per
} the (now lost?) O'Reilly discussion guidelines. It not only
} helps raise my ratings in Google searches, as well as
} popularity in people who click on them, but I get thanks from
} people who see my subject appendings mid-thread out of dozens
} or even hundreds of items (saving them a lot of effort).
}
} Bryan J. Smith | Sent from Yahoo Mail
} mailto:b.j.smith@xxxxxxxx | (please excuse any
i agree on the thread issue myself yet i am not the mailing list expert. it
was just a suggestion as i recall the change from ncsd back to bind issues.
i had dismissed this thread until it dawned on me that i am an expert on DNS
among other things and have been for a decade or more yet i was distracted
with a new server and etc blah so my apologies...
since i dont have access to the machine i thought looking in those file
resolv.conf and named.conf would be a best start.
of course there are more potential issues people are already addressing so
ill see if i can get on board.
thanks
--
Robert Hanson
Abba Communications
http://www.abbacomm.net
