On Sat, 2005-04-09 at 20:35 -0400, Kennedy Clark wrote:
> On Apr 9, 2005 7:34 PM, Johnny Hughes <mailing-lists@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On a related point: I have been reading over in the postfix user list
> archives how they are *really* down on mixing MailScanner and Postfix.
> They say fairly serious queue, email and filesystem corruption is a
> certainty. Yikes. I'm stressing out now that I just invested a ton
> of time coming up to speed on MailScanner over the past 10 days. :-\
> Anyone have advice for me? Is it really that bad? Does the one
> instance of Postfix help (or better yet *fix*) this issue? Do recent
> versions make things any better/worse here?
>
> They seem to like amavisd-new.
>
Everyone has their own agenda (and favorite software) ... I have never
had a problem with MailScanner. I am using it in several places. I
know z00dax also uses MailScanner ... I have used amavisd-new, it works
fine too.
The postfix guys also say compile your own and don't use the distro
version. I say, also use RPMs so you can continue to get security
updates.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20050409/13be8b99/attachment.bin
