postfix tightening

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



Ajay Sharma wrote:

>Craig White wrote:
>  
>
>>On Fri, 2005-04-01 at 16:26 -0500, Chris Mauritz wrote:
>>
>>    
>>
>>>Personally, I reject mail from any server with broken DNS.  It's 
>>>extremely low hanging fruit to avoid a lot of spam from zombie PCs in 
>>>Asia/Eastern Europe.
>>>      
>>>
>
>[snip]
>
>  
>
>>Is the above suitable for an office mail server or is this for one
>>person who is less concerned about fringe stuff that may get rejected?
>>    
>>
>
>I run an "office" mail server and my boss would kill me if we bounced a
>message just because the client is using a brain dead ISP.  So our
>approach is a little different in that we accept a lot of mail and I
>spend my time on tuning spamassassin.
>
>  
>

Wow, then I guess I am lucky to have a boss that doesn't ask me to do 
foolish things or waste my time.  8-)

You can tune a spam filter til the cows come home, but I just think it's 
idiotic to accept mail from any server where the admin isn't on the ball 
enough to even properly set up the DNS.  And if it's the ISP's fault, 
then that admin should pick a non-braindead ISP.

And the honourary Don Quixote award goes to......

Cheers,

C

-- 
Chris Mauritz
chrism@xxxxxxxxx
VP & Chief Technology Officer
Independent Music Network
http://www.imntv.com


[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux