This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------060003040503090703000203
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [Centos] is centos3.1 compatible with dag's el3 repo?
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2004 10:15:22 +0200
From: sophana <sophana78@xxxxxxxx>
To: Dag Wieers <dag@xxxxxxxxxx>
References: <412B3E8B.7020805@xxxxxxxx>
<Pine.LNX.4.61.0408241519120.6016@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Dag Wieers wrote:
>Correct me if I'm wrong, but I think
>
> CentOS 3 = Red Hat Enterprise Linux 3 U1
> CentOS 3.1 = Red Hat Enterprise Linux 3 U2
>
>Although I would have prefered CentOS to follow the Red Hat numbering
>instead of adding confusion. Soon U3 will be released and there will
>probably be a CentOS 3.2 release.
Ok I understand, I thought the RHEL2.1 has existed so I also thought
that RHEL 3.1 existed also.
I would also have prefered strict redhat numbering: centos 3 update2
If redhat release RHEL3.1 what will be centos name?
>>For example I wish to install evms from dag's repo. Is there any problem?
>
>No, any problem you encounter should be reported and fixed. It is
>all designed to work together. (except for kernel module packages)
>
evms needs a set of kernel patch to be applied. Do you think I can find
one already patched or I should do it myself?
If I do it, would you be interested in having the evms patched rpm? (I
don't know how to do a rpm, but I can try)
Is there a problem that a package depends on a kernel rpm?
Regards
--------------060003040503090703000203
Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
<title></title>
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
<br>
<br>
-------- Original Message --------
<table border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th align="right" nowrap="nowrap" valign="baseline">Subject: </th>
<td>Re: [Centos] is centos3.1 compatible with dag's el3 repo?</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th align="right" nowrap="nowrap" valign="baseline">Date: </th>
<td>Thu, 26 Aug 2004 10:15:22 +0200</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th align="right" nowrap="nowrap" valign="baseline">From: </th>
<td>sophana <<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:sophana78@xxxxxxxx";>sophana78@xxxxxxxx</a>></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th align="right" nowrap="nowrap" valign="baseline">To: </th>
<td>Dag Wieers <<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:dag@xxxxxxxxxx";>dag@xxxxxxxxxx</a>></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th align="right" nowrap="nowrap" valign="baseline">References: </th>
<td><<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:412B3E8B.7020805@xxxxxxxx";>412B3E8B.7020805@xxxxxxxx</a>>
<<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Pine.LNX.4.61.0408241519120.6016@xxxxxxxxxxxxx";>Pine.LNX.4.61.0408241519120.6016@xxxxxxxxxxxxx</a>></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<br>
<br>
<pre>Dag Wieers wrote:
>Correct me if I'm wrong, but I think
>
> CentOS 3 = Red Hat Enterprise Linux 3 U1
> CentOS 3.1 = Red Hat Enterprise Linux 3 U2
>
>Although I would have prefered CentOS to follow the Red Hat numbering
>instead of adding confusion. Soon U3 will be released and there will
>probably be a CentOS 3.2 release.
Ok I understand, I thought the RHEL2.1 has existed so I also thought
that RHEL 3.1 existed also.
I would also have prefered strict redhat numbering: centos 3 update2
If redhat release RHEL3.1 what will be centos name?
>>For example I wish to install evms from dag's repo. Is there any problem?
>
>No, any problem you encounter should be reported and fixed. It is
>all designed to work together. (except for kernel module packages)
>
evms needs a set of kernel patch to be applied. Do you think I can find
one already patched or I should do it myself?
If I do it, would you be interested in having the evms patched rpm? (I
don't know how to do a rpm, but I can try)
Is there a problem that a package depends on a kernel rpm?
Regards
</pre>
</body>
</html>
--------------060003040503090703000203--
