Other than the following copyrighted parts to CentOS 3.1,
Does Definite Software Ltd have any copyright restrictions
on any code written by persons on the CentOS 3.1 project?
#-----------------------------------------------------------------------
# anaconda-images.spec.mydiff
#-----------------------------------------------------------------------
#> Summary: Images used in the CentOS installer
#> Release: 2.centos.1
#> License: GPL - CentOS logos Copyright 2003 and Trademark Definite Software
#Ltd
#> The anaconda-images package contains images used in anaconda, the CentOS
#installer.
#-----------------------------------------------------------------------
# redhat-artwork.spec.mydiff
#-----------------------------------------------------------------------
#> Summary: Artwork for CentOS default look-and-feel
#> Release: 1E.centos.3
#> URL: http://www.centos.org
#> License: GPL - CentOS logos Copyright 2003 and Trademark Definite Software
#Ltd
#> redhat-artwork contains the themes and icons that make up the CentOS
#default
#> - changed to CentOS artwork
#-----------------------------------------------------------------------
# redhat-logos.spec.mydiff
#-----------------------------------------------------------------------
#> Summary: CentOS-related icons and pictures.
#> Release: 1.centos.3
#> License: GPL - CentOS logos Copyright 2003 and Trademark Definite Software
#Ltd
#> The redhat-logos package contains logos for CentOS.
#-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Kevin Wood
Clarifying the question until the question becomes clear.
