For some additional context, all my hardware is Supermicro and working great on 4.9.13 - 26. I have dom0_max_vcpus=2 because of issues I was having with deadlocked CPU cores before setting that option on 3.18 kernels. In my experience setting that value doesn't cause any detriment to the dom0, which isn't doing most of the work anyway. These are all the motherboards I'm running the kernel stably on: Supermicro X8DT3 Supermicro X8DT6 Supermicro X9DRD-iF/LF Supermicro X9DRT Supermicro X9SCL/X9SCM I'm on CentOS 6 across the board. On 04/21/2017 05:01 AM, Mark L Sung wrote: > Hummmm, seems there are still stability issues on the > "4.9.2-26.el7.x86_64", recently hear many issue related to Supermicro > board! :-( > > Peace!!! > > On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 9:40 AM, Anderson, Dave <daveanderson@xxxxxxx > <mailto:daveanderson@xxxxxxx>> wrote: > > Good news/bad news testing the new kernel on CentOS7 with my now > notoriously finicky machines: > > Good news: 4.9.23-26.el7 (grabbed today via yum update) isn't any > worse than 4.9.13-22 was on my xen hosts (as far as I can tell so > far at least) > > Bad news: It isn't any better than 4.9.13 was for me either, if I > don't set vcpu limit in the grub/xen config, it still panics like so: > > [ 6.716016] CPU: Physical Processor ID: 0 > [ 6.720199] CPU: Processor Core ID: 0 > [ 6.724046] mce: CPU supports 2 MCE banks > [ 6.728239] Last level iTLB entries: 4KB 512, 2MB 8, 4MB 8 > [ 6.733884] Last level dTLB entries: 4KB 512, 2MB 32, 4MB 32, 1GB 0 > [ 6.740770] Freeing SMP alternatives memory: 32K > (ffffffff821a8000 - ffffffff821b0000) > [ 6.750638] ftrace: allocating 34344 entries in 135 pages > [ 6.771888] smpboot: Max logical packages: 1 > [ 6.776363] VPMU disabled by hypervisor. > [ 6.780479] Performance Events: SandyBridge events, PMU not > available due to virtualization, using software events only. > [ 6.792237] NMI watchdog: disabled (cpu0): hardware events not > enabled > [ 6.798943] NMI watchdog: Shutting down hard lockup detector on > all cpus > [ 6.805949] installing Xen timer for CPU 1 > [ 6.810659] installing Xen timer for CPU 2 > [ 6.815317] installing Xen timer for CPU 3 > [ 6.819947] installing Xen timer for CPU 4 > [ 6.824618] installing Xen timer for CPU 5 > [ 6.829282] installing Xen timer for CPU 6 > [ 6.833935] installing Xen timer for CPU 7 > [ 6.838565] installing Xen timer for CPU 8 > [ 6.843110] smpboot: Package 1 of CPU 8 exceeds BIOS package data 1. > [ 6.849475] ------------[ cut here ]------------ > [ 6.854091] kernel BUG at arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c:997! > [ 6.855864] random: fast init done > [ 6.863070] invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP > [ 6.867088] Modules linked in: > [ 6.870168] CPU: 8 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/8 Not tainted > 4.9.23-26.el7.x86_64 #1 > [ 6.877298] Hardware name: Supermicro X9DRT/X9DRT, BIOS 3.2a > 08/04/2015 > [ 6.883920] task: ffff880058a6a5c0 task.stack: ffffc900400c0000 > [ 6.889840] RIP: e030:[<ffffffff8103e7e7>] [<ffffffff8103e7e7>] > identify_secondary_cpu+0x57/0x80 > [ 6.898756] RSP: e02b:ffffc900400c3f08 EFLAGS: 00010086 > [ 6.904069] RAX: 00000000ffffffe4 RBX: ffff88005d80a020 RCX: > ffffffff81e5ffc8 > [ 6.911201] RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: 0000000000000005 RDI: > 0000000000000005 > [ 6.918335] RBP: ffffc900400c3f18 R08: 00000000000000ce R09: > 0000000000000000 > [ 6.925466] R10: 0000000000000005 R11: 0000000000000006 R12: > 0000000000000008 > [ 6.932599] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: > 0000000000000000 > [ 6.939735] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88005d800000(0000) > knlGS:0000000000000000 > [ 6.947819] CS: e033 DS: 002b ES: 002b CR0: 0000000080050033 > [ 6.953565] CR2: 0000000000000000 CR3: 0000000001e07000 CR4: > 0000000000042660 > [ 6.960696] Stack: > [ 6.962731] 0000000000000008 0000000000000000 ffffc900400c3f28 > ffffffff8104ebce > [ 6.970205] ffffc900400c3f40 ffffffff81029855 0000000000000000 > ffffc900400c3f50 > [ 6.977691] ffffffff810298d0 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 > 0000000000000000 > [ 6.985164] Call Trace: > [ 6.987626] [<ffffffff8104ebce>] smp_store_cpu_info+0x3e/0x40 > [ 6.993480] [<ffffffff81029855>] cpu_bringup+0x35/0x90 > [ 6.998700] [<ffffffff810298d0>] cpu_bringup_and_idle+0x20/0x40 > [ 7.004706] Code: 44 89 e7 ff 50 68 0f b7 93 d2 00 00 00 39 d0 75 > 1c 0f b7 bb da 00 00 00 44 89 e6 e8 e4 02 01 00 85 c0 75 07 5b 41 5c > 5d c3 0f 0b <0f> 0b 0f b7 8b d4 00 00 00 89 c2 44 89 e6 48 c7 c7 90 > d3 ca 81 > [ 7.024976] RIP [<ffffffff8103e7e7>] > identify_secondary_cpu+0x57/0x80 > [ 7.031528] RSP <ffffc900400c3f08> > [ 7.035032] ---[ end trace f2a8d75941398d9f ]--- > [ 7.039658] Kernel panic - not syncing: Attempted to kill the > idle task! > > So...other than my work around...that still works...not sure what > else I can provide in the way of feedback/testing. But if you want > anything else gathered, let me know. > > Thanks, > -Dave > > -- > Dave Anderson > > > > On Apr 19, 2017, at 10:33 AM, Johnny Hughes <johnny@xxxxxxxxxx > <mailto:johnny@xxxxxxxxxx>> wrote: > > > > On 04/19/2017 12:18 PM, PJ Welsh wrote: > >> > >> On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 5:40 AM, Johnny Hughes <johnny@xxxxxxxxxx > <mailto:johnny@xxxxxxxxxx> > >> <mailto:johnny@xxxxxxxxxx <mailto:johnny@xxxxxxxxxx>>> wrote: > >> > >> On 04/18/2017 12:39 PM, PJ Welsh wrote: > >>> Here is something interesting... I went through the BIOS options and > >>> found that one R710 that *is* functioning only differed in that > "Logical > >>> Processor"/Hyperthreading was *enabled* while the one that is *not* > >>> functioning had HT *disabled*. Enabled Logical Processor and the > system > >>> starts without issue! I've rebooted 3 times now without issue. > >>> Dell R710 BIOS version 6.4.0 > >>> 2x Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU L5639 @ 2.13GHz > >>> 4.9.20-26.el7.x86_64 #1 SMP Tue Apr 4 11:19:26 CDT 2017 x86_64 > x86_64 > >>> x86_64 GNU/Linux > >>> > >> > >> Outstanding .. I have now released a 4.9.23-26.el6 and .el7 to the > >> system as normal updates. It should be available later today. > >> > >> <snip> > >> > >> > >> I've verified with a second Dell R710 that disabling > >> Hyperthreading/Logical Processor causes the primary xen booting > kernel > >> to fail and reboot. Consequently, enabling allows for the system to > >> start as expected and without any issue: > >> Current tested kernel was: 4.9.13-22.el7.x86_64 #1 SMP Sun Feb 26 > >> 22:15:59 UTC 2017 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux > >> > >> I just attempted an update and the 4.9.23-26 is not yet up. Does this > >> update address the Hyperthreading issue in any way? > >> > > > > I don't think so .. at least I did not specifically add anything > to do so. > > > > You can get it here for testing: > > > > https://buildlogs.centos.org/centos/7/virt/x86_64/xen/ > <https://buildlogs.centos.org/centos/7/virt/x86_64/xen/> > > > > (or from /6/ as well for CentOS-6) > > > > Not sure why it did not go out on the signing run .. will check > that server. > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > CentOS-virt mailing list > > CentOS-virt@xxxxxxxxxx <mailto:CentOS-virt@xxxxxxxxxx> > > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt > <https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt> > > _______________________________________________ > CentOS-virt mailing list > CentOS-virt@xxxxxxxxxx <mailto:CentOS-virt@xxxxxxxxxx> > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt > <https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt> > > > > > _______________________________________________ > CentOS-virt mailing list > CentOS-virt@xxxxxxxxxx > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt > -- Kevin Stange Chief Technology Officer Steadfast | Managed Infrastructure, Datacenter and Cloud Services 800 S Wells, Suite 190 | Chicago, IL 60607 312.602.2689 X203 | Fax: 312.602.2688 kevin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx | www.steadfast.net _______________________________________________ CentOS-virt mailing list CentOS-virt@xxxxxxxxxx https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt
