On 02/28/2016 04:47 AM, Karanbir Singh wrote: > On 28/02/16 00:04, Peter wrote: >> >> The issue there is you can't expect every third-part kernel vendor to >> add that provide. > > Everyone who cared to should have done in the last 8 odd years the xen > stack has been available on CentOS - beyond that, we should build a good > local story and ensure other vendors have the opportunity to come along. > > You seem to be arguing for a broken story for some third party corner case, > > We have a local kernel, built for purpose, tested for purpose, and used > within the ecosystem by other efforts that require or provide a xen > interface, lets just stick with trying to make that better. > > besides, there is nothing stopping users from later installing whatever > other keys they want. Pretty sure a majority of the userbase wont. > > regards > you would still need to do yum upgrade to get the new libvirt and seabios bits to support xen, so I don't see why also relying on that for the kernel is any more a problem.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ CentOS-virt mailing list CentOS-virt@xxxxxxxxxx https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt
