On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 4:17 PM, Alvin Starr <alvin@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > My comment was targeted more at naming than support. > > I appreciate that there are vanishingly few resources to throw at support. > > I am glad to see any xen support for C7 and am thankful of all those who are > putting in time to make things happen. > I try to help out when I can but it is all too infrequently. Yes, that's the way I understood you. :-) It's an interesting model to consider; as I said earlier, making that the standard (either always having "xen44", "xen46", "xen48", or starting with "xen" and then major upgrades getting renames as you suggest) has certain advantages if we ever go the manpower to maintain two different versions. -George _______________________________________________ CentOS-virt mailing list CentOS-virt@xxxxxxxxxx https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt
