On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 1:53 PM, Haïkel Guémar <hguemar@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 21/09/15 12:58, Alan Pevec wrote:
>> +1 on my side. oVirt has several packages tagged in from cloud SIG,
>> maybe we can have them in this virt-common repo as well. Or maybe
>> already exists something like cloud-common we can depend on.
>
> We might end-up in circular dependecies, looks like we actually need
> cross-SIG-common for EPEL rebuilds and stuff like OVS.
+2 for a CBS common, it's not realistic to maintain common EPEL rebuilds>
> As for cloud-common: no we don't have it defined yet, OpenStack/RDO were
> the only active cloud-infra project in CentOS CloudSIG, and we only had
> cloud-openstack-common for OpenStack release-agnostic dependencies.
>
> Cheers,
> Alan
>
or keep retagging them from other SIGs.
Alan suggested that we encourage EPEL to keep in fedora dist-git and
build in CBS. That could be a way to solve the issue around EPEL.
It solves the problem that EPEL is lacking contributors, and duplicating
work within CBS.
that would be great, +1
Regards,
H.
Sandro Bonazzola
Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration.
See how it works at redhat.com
Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration.
See how it works at redhat.com
_______________________________________________ CentOS-virt mailing list CentOS-virt@xxxxxxxxxx https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt
